Settings and activity
5 results found
-
92 votes
tuttlinghorn
supported this idea
·
-
46 votestuttlinghorn
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment tuttlinghorn
commented
seriously, not a priority. wake up & Grow Up !!
-
90 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment tuttlinghorn
commented
last one
Also ... and here's one for ya ...... I am not a US citizen nor do I live in the US. But in this forum, my vote's as good as yours. Assuming this (uservoice) format gets subsumed into the communications strategy of the new administration, maybe they could base registration on a social sec number. Crazy if they dont.
Great idea though watch this plummet as the non-tweeters arrive ..An error occurred while saving the comment tuttlinghorn
commented
Though I love this, it is is open to 'moblobs'* - (imagine Avaaz or MoveOn direct their users on here to focus on one issue?) and means a higher proportional representation of tech-literate people.
Doesn't mean don't do it, just needs some smarter people than me to work through the snags.
*i.e. replicating the current system of lobbying, just easier to subvertAn error occurred while saving the comment tuttlinghorn
commented
Look how many followers he has and he is not even in office yet - I cannot see how he would be able to staff up to respond to all tweets. That's why there are local representatives - maybe whats needed is a many-many-one communication hierarchy : Citizen-Representative(n)-Leader : Using something like this (uservoice) allows aggregation of local requirements.
tuttlinghorn
supported this idea
·
-
341 votestuttlinghorn
supported this idea
·
OK that was a bit harsh. something bad happened when I passed 35 ....